ALEC Statement of Principles on Toll Roads Exposed
The ALEC Statement of Principles on Toll Roads was adopted by ALEC's Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development Task Force on August 1, 2008, approved by the ALEC Board of Directors on September 11, 2008. An updated version of this Statement of Principles is available on ALEC.org, titled "ALEC Statement of Principles on Road Transportation Financing. Language removed from the original is marked in
strikethrough, additions marked in bold. (Accessed on 3/11/2016).
ALEC Statement Text
The Department of Transportation projects traffic congestion is costing the U.S. economy as much as $200 billion a year. Government policy should encourage a market-driven highway system, one that responds to the needs of users, on a user-pays basis. Traffic congestion imposes enormous costs on the U.S. economy. Because of future deficits in the Federal Transportation Highway Trust Fund, the federal government will be unable to adequately fund needed improvements for our roads. In fact, beginning in 2009 the Transportation Trust Fund is facing a $4-5 billion deficit. Hence, innovative financing methods, such as public-private partnerships, have a vital role to play in solving our current transportation problems. Government policy should encourage a market-driven highway system, one that responds to the needs of users, on a user-pays basis. Private investment in highway projects generates new sources of money, ideas, and efficiency.
ALEC [insert state here] supports tolling of single passenger vehicles in High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes.
Across the country, states are implementing High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. These lanes give consumers greater choice in transportation and generate additional revenues.
ALEC [insert state here] supports the restoration of the integrity of state and federal highway trust funds, by ending the diversion of fuel-tax revenue for non-highway purposes.
Each successive federal surface transportation bill has further expanded the fraction of the federal highway trust fund that can be diverted to non-highway purposes. A number of states no longer restrict highway user tax revenues to highway purposes, as was once nearly standard practice.
ALEC [insert state here] believes the highway system should be funded on a fully user-pays basis. Other forms of transportation, for which users are not willing or able to pay the full cost, should be subsidized (if at all) out of general state or federal revenues.
ALEC [insert state here] supports the use of tolling for the addition of new highway capacity.
ALEC [insert state here] believes tolls are an important mechanism for funding the construction and operation of highway facilities. As fuel economy continues to improve and alternative propulsion sources become practical and economical, traditional fuel taxes will play a gradually smaller role as a funding source. Direct user payments via tolls will be increasingly critical to the rebuilding and expansion and modernization of this country’s highway system, especially investments to ease traffic congestion on urban expressways and to rebuild and modernize major inner-city highways.
ALEC [insert state here] supports increasing or eliminating the federal limit on tax-exempt bonds for private investment on highways.
Currently there is a total limit of $15 billion for Private Activity Bonds. This limit should either be increased or eliminated.
ALEC [insert state here] supports the use of pricing and advanced technologies on toll roads to reduce highway congestion.
ALEC [insert state here] believes proceeds from tollways should be dedicated to transportation projects.
ALEC [insert state here] supports the principle of federalism; Congress and USDOT should avoid regulations that would restrict state flexibility in determining the role of tolling and public-private partnerships.
Adopted by the Commerce, Insurance and Economic Development Task Force on August 1, 2008.
Approved by the ALEC Board of Directors on September 11, 2008